Ten Points to Save the West And A 28th Constitutional Ammendment
Posted by admin / Under LawGeert Wilders, the Dutch politician who is about to stand trial for hate speech against Muslims, has suggested a ten-point program to save the West from being jihadically overrun. The times are so surreal. Wilders, who is also due to speak on 9/11 in downtown Manhattan, near Ground Zero suggests that we must: 1. Stop cultural relativism. We need an article in our constitutions that lays down that we have a Jewish-Christian and humanism culture. 2. Stop pretending that Islam is a religion. Islam is a totalitarian ideology. In other words, the right to religious freedom should not apply to...
Which comes first, Faith or Works? Romans 4
Posted by admin / Under LawWhich comes first, Faith or works? Romans 4 by billrandles Cometh this blessedness then upon the circumcision only, or upon the uncircumcision also? for we say that faith was reckoned to Abraham for righteousness.How was it then reckoned? when he was in circumcision, or in uncircumcision? Not in circumcision, but in uncircumcision.And he received the sign of circumcision, a seal of the righteousness of the faith which he had yet being uncircumcised: that he might be the father of all them that believe, though they be not circumcised; that righteousness might be imputed unto them also:And the father of circumcision to...
Administration Appeals Court Stay on Stem Cell Funding
Posted by admin / Under LawThe Obama Administrations Justice Department filed paperwork in federal court seeking to lift the ban on federal funding of human embryonic stem cell research that was ordered by Judge Royce Lamberth of the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia. Lamberth ruled that a presidential executive order could not supplant existing legislation barring this use of taxpayer money. The Justice Departments motion argued that Lamberths ruling is invalid because the Presidents executive order was issued subsequent to the legislation upon which the Court based its ruling and that this subsequent law making, therefore supercedes the earlier act of congress....
Yes, you can open carry a pistol in Connecticut
Posted by admin / Under LawAnd you can responsibly carry a pistol in a bar that serves alcohol, and you can even carry your firearm on college campuses. I thought most of the misconceptions concerning Connecticut state law when it comes to permits and carrying handguns had been squashed, yet some continue to put totally false garbage out there. Im not going to speak to any specific case in Connecticut, but I am going to briefly review the completely false comments made here on this blog by Army Strong.
Louisiana College given building for law school in Shreveport
Posted by admin / Under LawThe owners of a 106-year-old building in Shreveport have given it to Louisiana College for a law school planned to open in 2012. College President Joe Aguillard says the former CNB/United Mercantile building is within walking distance of several courthouses and law offices, and even looks like a law school. The Times reports that the college plans an 80,000-square-foot addition to include a lecture hall, library, student center and glass-enclosed tennis and basketball court. Louisiana College is a Baptist college in Pineville. Aguillard says the law school "will acknowledge the Judeo-Christian foundation of the legal system."
Your Dog's Papers (and your money), Please.
Posted by admin / Under LawSeptember 03, 2010 Your Dog's Papers (and your money), Please. Jason McNew Under Pennsylvania Law, animal control officers can carry firearms and have powers of arrest. Here in Adams County, PA (seat of Gettysburg and the battle fields), The Evening Sun reports that local dog law enforcement "will be knocking on doors across Adams County in the second canvass this year to make sure all dogs are vaccinated, licensed and safe". The article further explains: "The maximum fine per violation of the licensing and rabies requirements is $300, in addition to possible court costs." Using the Law of Averages, one...
Florida Fourth DCA rejects Jamaican cane cutter challenge to cash appeal bond requirement
Posted by admin / Under Law4th DCA kills cane cutters appeal over wages Sugar cane cutters 21-year effort to sue for back wages hit another roadblock Wednesday when the 4th District Court of Appeal upheld a decision requiring each worker to post a $100 bond to sue in small claims court. A split three-judge panel ruled a Palm Beach Circuit appellate panel acted within its discretion when workers challenged a section of the 1838 state Constitution requiring nonresidents to post the bond when filing lawsuits. The decision is just the latest setback for farmworkers trying to sue for back wages since 1989. About 1,500 workers,...
The Ground Zero Imams Troubling Texts
Posted by admin / Under LawIts now clear to most Americans that while Imam Feisal Rauf has the right to build his mosque wherever he desires, his decision to build it near Ground Zero is grossly insensitive, to say the least, and flies in the face of his reputation as a moderate bridge builder. Lets take a closer look at whether Imam Rauf is truly a moderate Muslim leader whose teachings are in line with American principles. New York Timess Maureen Dowd insists that, you have to be willfully blind not to know that the imam in charge of the project, Feisal Abdul Rauf, is...
O, Palestine!
Posted by admin / Under LawThe notion of a Palestinian people and Palestinian identity, although taken for granted today, has neither a long nor a distinguished history. Understanding its origins and what it represents explains why the peace process between Israel and the Arabs has failed and will continue to fail. Inherent in Palestinianism, from its origins, is the rejection of a Jewish state in any form. That opposition is not negotiable and not open to compromise; it is essential. Palestinianism was never for anything; its raison d'?tre was to prevent the establishment of a Jewish state. That purpose has never changed. Concern for Palestine...
Pavement Privacy
Posted by admin / Under LawOne normally does not picture a sitting federal judge adorned in both a black robe and a red rubber nose. Yet this is the common mental image we have of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, alternately referred to as the Ninth Circus or the Numb Circuit due to the paired inanity of its decrees and a rate of overturned decisions bested only by mothers arguing with their kids over cotton candy being a dinner entrée. ... Such is the case with a recent ruling in which Nonsensical Ninth declared that your driveway was not private property....



